The fundamental technique of online coloring Black and White photos is almost comparable. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning are two terms that are often used interchangeably.
To understand from black and white images and their colored counterparts, deep learning has been using a neural network and a training set. After being given many photos, the model can learn how to color additional black and white images. You may colorize and post your black and white images to a variety of web platforms. Vance AI Photo Colorizer allows you to colorize a photo for free online in about 5 seconds.
Deep learning can also be used to convert any black-and-white images to color. You may colorize old family photos, historical people, ancestors, films, and more with an image colorizer.
With their new color correction function, you can instantly remove the yellow tinge from old images. With their customized AI capabilities, you can automatically enhance the face and more details in vintage photos. Moreover, it won't cause any charge when you download the colorized photo.
Add Lifelike Color to Old Photos with Colourise Official Colourise allows you to make black and white photos look natural and even stunning.
Plus, there is no annoying watermark when you colorize photos. You can share the results with your families or friends to revive old photos and precious memories. We appreciate the code published by Rich Zhang on GitHub.
Not sure how great Colourise works? Move the slider to colorize this sample photo. Colorize Photo with Colourise. A new site called Colourise. It's completely free to use. It recommends you try photos with human subjects and nature. It then generates an image with colours that are plausible.
Keep in mind it doesn't guarantee that the colourised image is an accurate representation. But we tried it with several black-and-white photos and were immediately impressed with the results. The colours added by the service's AI certainly look plausible and realistic to us. We were able to download the new colourised photo by itself, as well as a comparison image of both the black and white photo and the colourised one side by side. This gets even harder for languages where the token language is not regular, such as TypeScript with JSX:.
Does the bracket at [1] match the bracket at [2] or at [3]? This depends on the length of the template literal expression, which only a tokenizer with unbounded state which is a non-regular tokenizer can determine correctly. Luckily, syntax highlighting has to solve a similar problem: should the bracket at [2] in the previous code snippet be rendered as string or as plain text?
As it turns out, just ignoring brackets in comments and strings as identified by syntax highlighting works well enough for most bracket pairs. VS Code already has an efficient and synchronous mechanism to maintain token information used for syntax highlighting and we can reuse that to identify opening and closing brackets. This is another challenge of the Bracket Pair Colorization extension that affects performance negatively: it does not have access to these tokens and has to recompute them on its own.
We thought long about how we could efficiently and reliably expose token information to extensions, but came to the conclusion that we cannot do this without a lot of implementation details leaking into the extension API.
Because the extension still has to send over a list of color decorations for each bracket in the document, such an API alone would not even solve the performance problem. This ensures that the UI does not freeze, even though tokenization happens synchronously in the renderer. The core idea is to use a recursive descent parser to build an abstract syntax tree AST that describes the structure of all bracket pairs.
When a bracket is found, check the token information and skip the bracket if it is in a comment or string. A tokenizer allows the parser to peek and read such bracket or text tokens. With only lengths available, a bracket node at a given position can still be located efficiently in the AST. Both ASTs describe the same document, but when traversing the first AST, the absolute positions have to be computed on the fly which is cheap to do , while they are already precomputed in the second one.
However, when inserting a single character into the first tree, only the lengths of the node itself and all its parent nodes must be updated - all other lengths stay the same. When absolute positions are stored as in the second tree, the position of every node later in the document must be incremented.
Also, by not storing absolute offsets, leaf nodes having the same length can be shared to avoid allocations. Querying such an AST to list all brackets and their nesting level in the viewport is relatively simple: do a depth-first traversal, compute the absolute position of the current node on the fly by adding the length of earlier nodes , and skip children of nodes that are entirely before or after the requested range. What ruins performance when querying brackets in a given range are really long lists: we cannot do a fast binary search on their children to skip all irrelevant non-intersecting nodes, as we need to sum each node's length to compute the absolute position on the fly.
In the worst-case, we need to iterate over all of them. In the following example we have to look at 13 nodes in blue until we find the bracket at position While we could compute and cache length sums to enable binary search, this has the same problem as storing absolute positions: we would need to recompute all of them every time a single node grows or shrinks, which is costly for very long lists.
If we can ensure that each list only has a bounded number of children and resembles a balanced tree of logarithmic height, it turns out that this is sufficient to get the desired logarithmic performance for querying brackets. We use 2,3 -trees to enforce that these lists are balanced: every list must have at least 2 and at most 3 children, and all children of a list must have the same height in the balanced list tree. Note that a bracket pair is considered a leaf of height 0 in the balanced tree, but it might have children in the AST.
When constructing the AST from scratch during initialization, we first collect all children and then convert them to such a balanced tree. This can be done in linear time. A possible 2,3 -tree of the example before could look like the following. Note that we now only need to look at 8 nodes in blue to find the bracket pair at position 24 and that there is some freedom whether a list has 2 or 3 children:.
Luckily, documents that are nested even deeper are atypical, so we don't consider them in our worst-case analysis. The most interesting question of performant bracket pair colorization remains open: given the current balanced AST and a text edit that replaces a certain range, how do we efficiently update the tree to reflect the text edit?
The idea is to reuse the recursive descent parser used for initialization and add a caching strategy, so nodes that aren't affected by the text edit can be reused and skipped. If this is the case, this node does not need to be reparsed and the underlying tokenizer can just be advanced by the length of the node.
After consuming the node, parsing continues. Note that this node can both be a single bracket pair or an entire list. Also, if there are multiple such reusable nodes, the longest one should be taken. The following example shows which nodes can be reused in green when a single opening bracket is inserted omitting individual bracket nodes :.
After processing the text edit by reparsing the nodes that contain edits and reusing all unchanged nodes, the updated AST looks as follows. Note that all 11 reusable nodes can be reused by consuming the 3 nodes B, H and G and only 4 nodes had to be recreated in orange :. As demonstrated by this example, balanced lists do not only make querying fast, but also help to reuse huge chunks of nodes at once.
We also ignore the rare case of closing brackets that have no opening counterpart for now. We only have to reparse nodes that intersect the edit range.
0コメント